This is Thomas, the managing director at World Help disability Welfare Foundation Singapore. Again it is truly strange and unfortunate that ICOEthics simply choose not to respond to proper replies and explanations provided by the IDAC team aiming at clarifying the doubts. Certain important details were also intentionally left out of their discussion. ICOEthics also failed to provide the reason behind this intentional disregard of many important details they have been provided with by the devs when asked. Instead they keep on holding on to the same outdated 'proof' for which explanations and apologies have been given a long time ago. These apologies and explanations have not been professionally discussed or mentioned by ICOEthics, they do not communicate at all or respond, especially when we have informed them that we are able to provide legal documents of our organisation for them to verify.

We suspect there is blackmailing and foulplay involved with ICOethics. According to some investigation conducted, ICOEthics.com ranks at 5, 524, 013th, with very little traffic and also a donating system that accepts 'contributions' to their organisation. The amount of contributions they received at the moment is '0' ETH. Within the posts by ICOEthics against IDAC, some choices or words are very unprofessional and there are also obvious racism in some of expression used, which we will take into consideration when discussing our further actions. The team is in the mids of discussing how they can resolve the issue, lawyer engagements are also being discussed.

we are happy to answer any questions about IDAC, our testnet is almost completed and will be available for testing soon. We believe that this milestone will be able to prove our product and intentions, at the same time debunking any dubious claims.

Thomas