i am against throwing opposers off the network so minorities get a faked consensus. but the devs advocate it (UASF)
But when the UASF happened, would you agree that Segwit as an
inclusive soft fork was better for the network because it did not throw anyone out of the network?
i am against the idea of mandatory forks.
Were you against Roger Ver's "must fork to big blocks or be left behind" which caused a chain-split?
also throwing my username into the same sentance as cash is foolish too. but i can see your motivations are clear now
you really have gone full FUD.
Is it FUD? You are the person who first told me about the idea of Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash bilaterally split into two. Would you still have the same perception if Bitcoin Cash hard forked to double the monetary supply to 42 million?