Open a scam accusation. Provide proof in the scam accusation. Otherwise, there is no point saying it here.
Privcoin's case is strong enough for me to believe that changenow is running some kind of shady business at the very best, by using "KYC" as an excuse to hold onto customer funds for much longer than they are supposed to.
There's always a counterparty risk if you're not comfortable with providing ID to them, which a lot of people aren't especially with all the proof of funds stuff. Always take their claims of anonymity with a grain of salt, I guess.
Interesting claims. I miss evidence though.
I think that there is evidence enough in the fact that changenow is directly responding, without disputing any claims in regards to the fact that they are indeed holding/scamming the funds that Privcoin initially deposited.