"As a fix for this bondholders who refuse to payback funds will retain ownership of their bonds forcefully until the dividends have covered their overpayment."
Um, there is already such a system in place. Its called SELLING BONDS IN A FORUM THREAD.
--
"The Dec/Jan hardware is in hand, I was just letting it mine to pay itself off part way as it came from my pocket

but it's about time to start moving it over to LRM."
My jaw dropped when I read this. How long has it been mining for you personally? This is going to be another case where I ask for clarification and you ignore me. But for the love of dog, please tell me you haven't been keeping the proceeds from this hardware for more than two weeks. There is no appropriate justification for this if its true. "it came from my pocket" is not a credible explanation after you've sold thousands of BTC worth of bonds to buy hardware. If you are jumbling your personal mining endeavors with LRM mining, then please, please buy my bonds back now so I can get off of the crazy train.
--
And just so that it is a matter of public record, I was overpaid. It is substantially less than this coming Saturday's dividend payment, and as LR mentions above, the difference will be subtracted from my payment. Problem solved.
grnbrg and I verify all transactions before bonds change hands and can turn down a sale.
The hardware has been in hand for about a week as that's all it took to pay it off (I got it cheap) and there's still another TH coming in. This will be added to LRM after this weeks div payment. I just didn't want to use company funds on it. Be glad I'm adding it when I could just as well keep it theoretically.