(those 100 FRQ transactions were me before I stopped to read the rules!

)
Ah, sorry for the low limits, you should have gotten 99% back automatically (and not 96% as site incorrectly stated for a while)
I'm not one of the FairQuark-rich, so initial "house" funds were quite low and I wasn't sure about the correctness of the code -- and there were actual bugs, in which case the game assumed a win... which explains the current imbalance between wins and losses in the stats, the dice game behaved a bit like a faucet for a few hours ;-)
The house has been subsidized by a donator (tanks!), so I've raised the bet limits a bit. Things should hopefully be stable now, and the "probably fair" hash history log will start getting published tomorrow (random number generator code already made public).
As I get more confident in the stability and performance, I'll raise limits and more varied odds.
(PS: I don't anticipate to get rich on it, but to learn the ropes of bitcoin API & blockchain hacks)