Now I am focusing to invest in ICOs. As a regular bounty hunter, I can realize which ICO is good and which is bad. Because I follow the most trustful ICO rating website Icobench, I have enough time to read project's whitepaper and look after at their community activity. But recently I realized Icobench's rating is not everything! I want to mention some ICOs name that had an impressive positive rating! But they couldn't raise even 1 Million USD! A project like FTEC, Enkidu can be a good example. What is the reason here?
When you invest in ICOs, what thing you take seriously?
the site rating does not provide an objective appraisal, so it goes a good way of selecting the ICO. most of the sites of the sort only a judgment that is contrived. analysis of its own view of the background and goals of the team concept will be able to determine the feasibility of the ICO.