the second blockchain would have 1M coins. If not fixed after 16000 blocks it would generate other 500000 coins, and again after other 16000 and again, again and again.
I personally vote for the first blockchain, but if fixed also the second is usable
Well, there's teo main ways you can handle the alternate blockchain;
- Let it die
- Let it carry on, and consider the bug a "feature".
Again, I'm not sure who would want to mine or hold a coin long term that decreases in value over time. I did actually once joke about the idea of a coin that would create a massive influx of coins after so many blocks. I created a thread about it a few weeks ago. I think I dubbed it DumpCoin, or something like that.
Sure, if people want "Dumpcoin", they can rebrand the coin and mine it all they want. But it's completely the opposite of what Premine is trying to accomplish, so for it to survive it would need to be rebranded, or possibly re-released.
alternatively we could allow the extra 500k coins and issue the fix for the future so it doesn't happen again next time.
Personally I don't want to see that happen, but it is a valid option.