Likening is issue of forks happening to religion would surely touch some nerves because of the attachment people have towards their religious believe and they may start to think you are making one superior over the other or insinuating that one is an offspring of the other which then bring about the question, "which one is original"?.
That being said, I really don't have issue with the forks of another fork because its simply someone being served its own coin that babe polarised the entire crypto space. I wonder where the market would have been today should the starter of the fork debacle could have consolidated those efforts and publicity to one single crypto. It would have been to the benefit of all.
Bitcoin = Jews
Bitcoin Cash = Christians
Bitcoin SV = Muslim
Just like the original, we have a fork of a fork.
First there were Jews (Bitcoin). Then, Jesus came along and said: 'here is some new bullshit'. People who believed the new bullshit, we're previously Jews but then became Christians by following the new bullshit (Bitcoin Cash - brought to you by Bitcoin Jesus no less). After about 630 years, along came Muhammed (CSW). Muhammed said: 'here is even more bullshit to go on top of the other bullshit'. Christian followers of the even more bullshit, became Muslims (Bitcoin SV).
It is just a fork of a fork folks. We've seen it all before. History repeats itself again.