impossible to have a logical discussion with someone that just wants to argue and derail the discussion by focusing on stuff that has nothing to do with this company.
Just making a point about providing proof. I don't have Ken's certificates. You should have been asking these questions about his credentials 6months ago before you invested, it's a bit late now to be asking for this evidence - least of all from a fellow investor. I'm taking Ken at face value, that's what's called investor confidence. I also realise as an open and exposed individual who has involved his close family in this company that he has a lot to lose from outright lieing to shareholders.