My interpretation is that any NXT holder is damaged by anybody that steals NXT property. So theoretically, anybody owning NXT at the time of infringement would have standing to sue. Is that wrong?
James
And when a stakeholder is actually doing those things? Copying, cloning etc? isn't that the case with all those clones?
So I guess you have to be a Nxt stakeholder to clone Nxt. Looks like the NEM folks (apparently Nxt insiders) are busy collecting donations in Nxt and BTC for their Nxt clone:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=440185.0 Let the clone wars begin!
What was that again about the 'trap' in the code that'll render clones dead in 24 hours?