Re: Efudd's Z9/Mini Fuddware v2.1c / PS4 and ZEC Contests have started!
Anyone else experiencing major differences between reported hashrate in miner status and reported hashrate on pool sites. I've been seeing 10-12k differences at least 2 or 3 times a day on my Z9 for a while now and this comes out to more like a 20% dev fee than a 1% dev fee. I installed the firmware on two of my z9 mini's and I frequently see hashrates 1-4K below what is reported in the miner status.
I've attached some screenshots.
**Update: I'm trying 2.1c firmware on the Z9 now after reading some recent posts, but I already have 2.1c on the Z9 mini where I'm noticing up to 20% dependencies.***
**Update2: Nevermind I definitely had 2.1c firmware on Z9 already, it just doesn't list it at the top of the page in System Summary it just says 2.1**
I asked about this in a PM, but got no response. Is the option still available to be a paid user? I would rather pay a lump sum and avoid the dev fee and possible bugs making it larger than the 3.67%. People have 1% in mind because at one point in this post or in the firmware notes it did say 1%. I don't know when that changed, but somewhere in some description you definitely listed 1% as the dev fee.
I've attached some screenshots.
**Update: I'm trying 2.1c firmware on the Z9 now after reading some recent posts, but I already have 2.1c on the Z9 mini where I'm noticing up to 20% dependencies.***
**Update2: Nevermind I definitely had 2.1c firmware on Z9 already, it just doesn't list it at the top of the page in System Summary it just says 2.1**
I asked about this in a PM, but got no response. Is the option still available to be a paid user? I would rather pay a lump sum and avoid the dev fee and possible bugs making it larger than the 3.67%. People have 1% in mind because at one point in this post or in the firmware notes it did say 1%. I don't know when that changed, but somewhere in some description you definitely listed 1% as the dev fee.
dtawom, you PMd me on 11/08/2018 asking if I would sell you firmware and if I had a mini version available. I apologize, I did not respond, that was an oversight on my part. At that point in time, I did not have a mini version available and I have not sold a version for minis.
The only mention, ever, of 1% was very early on when I asked about sold vs. dev. This was months back.
As far as pool differences go, I use flypool for some machines -- their averages are calculated over 15 minutes if memory serves. It doesn't always show correctly. That said, mine end up matching on long averages.
What do you mean "up to 20% dependencies" -- if you think I am taking 20% from you, please uninstall immediately. Simple as that.
If you are having issues or otherwise think I'm taking something from you that I have not disclosed, please uninstall the firmware. Simple as that. From the very moment I posted a "dev fee" supported release, I described *exactly* the sequence of events and *exactly* the timing. I've been clear on the calculations and have not hidden anything.
The firmware is *NOT* mining more than 10 minutes out of every 290 minutes total. It is *NOT* mining more than 49.65 minutes a day in the dev pool. It is *NOT* 1%, and it is *NOT* 3.6%. 49.65/1440 = 3.44%. How do I know this? I'm running the exact same firmware on test machines and am watching this like a hawk -- it's possible I have made mistakes, but every time someone has stated the timing is more than I've stated, I've been able to show timestamps +/- 10 seconds from what I've stated are the calculations.
I'm ok with pitchforks, but please contact me with your *SUPPORT ID* from your summary page. If you don't, there is simply no way that I can help.
Jason