good posters from 99.87% of the board are unicorns.
unicorn unmerited-better-than-0.13% posts
Very subtle difference there but such an expert as yourself should be able to spot it.
The issue is claiming merit is some objectively applied reward based on some set of criteria where all posts get equal chance of review.
No, the issue is still your extensive use of fallacies to justify your bullshit.
Nobody claims to review all posts nor is that needed. There is no need to review bounty reports and other garbage. There is no need to micromanage the merit system at the level of each individual post. What matters is that
in the long run good posters will tend to accumulate more merits than shitposters and that part seems to be working.
Feel free to let us know about those unmerited good posts any time.