^^^ The math involved in describing and calculating the optics is actually complex and the sources due to being flat earth conspiracy related are few. The only place currently available is from art books.
This is just more gaslighting, he knows the math describing the optics is complex.
This is just more gaslighting, he knows the math describing the optics is complex.
What happened to believing only things that you can verify and prove on your own?
What the fuck are you even referring to?
More gaslighting folks!
Perspective is an experiment anyone can do and see on their own. Every artist on planet earth knows about perspective (one point perspective). You give him a visual. And he asks "What happened to believing only things that you can verify and prove on your own?". WTF
Can that even be considered gaslighting?
I asked Google, first link, first sentence of the article:
"Gaslighting is a tactic in which a person or entity, in order to gain more power, makes a victim question their reality. ..." -- https://www.psychologytoday.com/ca/blog/here-there-and-everywhere/201701/11-warning-signs-gaslighting
It looks like I'm on track with with my claim of gaslighting, he's seemingly trying to bring uncertainty to the provable reality of perspective.
