This is great work. However is not exactly what I was after since I feel the concentration of meta board is highly disproportionate to the main bitcoin and altcoin discussion boards. With a handfull of posters dominating this entire sub board and doing a good job at the same time answering questions, keeping the board free of spammers, analysing merit .
Can you though remove merit given on meta club too. Just to demonstrate what will happen.
That would be interesting I mean most members on this forum never visit meta so that would be more of a sensible comparison to those that join bitcoin talk to talk about bitcoin or altcoins.
I mean my initial claim was that if the top 300 merits were removed from the top 200 (this is because there I assumed there are bunch that want into the foxy hole so are bestowing merit upon their desired club in the hop of some returns of even gaining access) and removing meta board.
I had the top 200 removed already https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1SAi_b3umCcFJO2dMoLYjWCjNz1JhOLWrsRHhYQK-nb8/edit#gid=429409603
But if you want to remove the top 200 and meta clubs that will go a long way to demonstrate most lose 80% + if full conditions are met.. as I assumed in the other thread. I mean I had thought the topic was finished with and everyone was happy to let it drop. However if you want to reconfirm what I said was true then that is great. I will give you some merits once you fulfill a true representation of what I said in the other thread but don't half meet my criteria for my statements and then assume you have made a rebuttal.
Great work so far and I do appreciate the effort.
Sad to hear that I am on ignore but I do understand that you did not enjoy me asking you to substantiate certain claims which were untrue.
Hopefully you will get over that and realise I am only actually stating things as they really are. It is not meant to upset people only serve as basis of how we can improve things over time.
People are taking this the wrong way.
I have already said that I am giving more merit to those that are already in the 0.13% too so it is not essentially a criticism merely demonstrating that because it is far easier to collide with a good post in meta than a good post in alt discussion the merit scores are skewed drastically away from boards where there are the vast majority of the population and therefore it is dangerous to make to many assumptions on the scores without investigating fully where they originate before placing any value on them.
For instance a poster posting only in alt discussion that has earned only 20 merits total could actually be as good or better poster than someone earning 400 merits in meta. That's all there is to it.
Not looking for another huge debate on this. You can just pull the stats as I set in the criteria for my statement in the other threads and leave it at that. People can draw their own conclusions. I hope you can change the OP though because you are directly referencing my statements without fulfilling the criteria I set as the basis.
@foxy
I am only concerned you have not given a high enough reward in this case. Please revise.
I had already requested and been given this data some weeks previously by r1s2g3 as I posted many times before... in many threads loyce references
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1SAi_b3umCcFJO2dMoLYjWCjNz1JhOLWrsRHhYQK-nb8/edit#gid=429409603