Re: [ANN] CosmosCR [$CYBR] 🌌Virtual reality metaverse powered by the blockchain!🌌
I've seen several VR projects that are somewhat similar to this one and has varying features and I wanna know what will be this project's greatest advantages over its competitors.
I think many of these vr projects are still on their infancy, they have plan on papers which may differ from what actually the result will be.
Yea totally agree, we think its really important to really put the foundation as perfect as possible, this needs much more planning than people actually think. Making a NFT is easy.
But think about solving this.
- People losing PK with land parcels on it.
- Content that is offensive for many people (easy to solve centralized, but we are creating a decentralized virtual world) True ownership is a asset.
- Rules in the virtual metaverse.
- Dynamic land system.
- Making it easy for people to create without programming knowledge.
- Data sharing to make the virtual world work as good as possible
Solving things like this will give us advantage in the future, but are not live in the present.
Uhh, you are right, it seemed easier than it really is.
If you can solve point 2 and 3 of your list you even can transfer it in the real world and making it a better place.
We have ways to solve point 2, but the problem making decisions decentralized takes much longer then centralized.
Point 3 will start with a basis and evolve over time together with the community.
Really? Even this counts as security?
I didn't think this before. But in SEC point of view, every ico is security. And people mostly buy these things to gain profit at some point, not spend in-app. If they would spend in-app, they would probably wait for the full version.
The chance is big yea, and you better not kick the Bull. We can make fancy models that reduce suppy with 90% and burn and pay dividend, but our goal is much better! Get adoption for the platform and that bring value on its own.
We really want this to serve as a utility token for the platform.
Aren't you based in Netherlands and probably not accepting any US citizens in ico.
So you are out of SEC's juristiction area which means they can't touch you.
We're indeed a dutch based and registrated company. We dont accept US and Chinese citizens in the ICO.
I dont think it's that easy, cause eventually the whole product need to be global and that include people from the US and China.
1) We want to be accepted on exchanges and exchanges dont list security's (if they do this can suddenly change in the future).
2) People from the US are allowed to buy utility tokens, just in the ICO it's different. If you make a dividend/burn system this can still be considered a security.