Re: Top 200 Merit receivers without Merit from the Top 200 Merit receivers
Someone has been complaining for a long time all over Meta about the top 200 Merit Receivers being a circle jerking club, asking for statistics of those without Merit from "their 200 friends" on the forum. I got tired of still getting dragged into this drama even after putting cryptohunter on ignore, so I did an analysis.
Feel free to (ab)use this for whatever creative statistics you can come up with. For example: I like it, as I'm above DdrmDdrm again, while in reality he kicked me down one spot. Isn't that great?
Or just apply some common sense, and you'll see it's completely normal to have less Merit, if you exclude the Top Merit Receivers, most of which are Top Merit Senders too. Could it even be possible Merit is mostly sent to good posts?
This goes beyond feeding the troll, this is like climbing into a lion's den at the zoo and trying to pet him. You know you're gonna get mutilated no matter what, right? Feel free to (ab)use this for whatever creative statistics you can come up with. For example: I like it, as I'm above DdrmDdrm again, while in reality he kicked me down one spot. Isn't that great?
Or just apply some common sense, and you'll see it's completely normal to have less Merit, if you exclude the Top Merit Receivers, most of which are Top Merit Senders too. Could it even be possible Merit is mostly sent to good posts?
If anyone could get the top 200 - remove the top 200 -250- 300 and meta board then put it up in the format above that would be great. Then just keep that updated and no need to comment on it again in future people can look at it a draw their own conclusions.
So you want to keep removing merits until you get the result that you want?Let me rephrase that. You want someone else to keep removing the merits and otherwise tweaking the numbers until you get the result that you want.