Re: [ANN] CREDITS - New Blockchain for financial industry [OFFICIAL THREAD]

Another day, another smoke screen to distract from failure to deliver mainnet.

Credits rents a few servers and calls it a partnership.
Almost feels like they enjoy being called a scam?
How is renting a few servers a partnership? XD

Also, nice to see that they change consensus rules last minute (shich is closed source anyway), and now apparently rent 200 nodes fron ibm.
Apparently they are moving to a Ripple like centralised and permissioned blockchain.

Will be nice to get all the cs fees from the txs, as the consensus will probably only select ibm cs nodes as main and trusted nodes.

Anyway, 17 more days to go for testnet 3.2, test 2 and 3, mainner and swap.
Lol.

Another day, another burak...

It's clear from the start that you haven't read the 2nd article on CS blog... You're just hopeless...
Again, you sold, no? Why do you care? Or you're that desperate and afraid that this project will be great success and you'll miss it so you anxiously want people or project itself to convince you it's real? That's just pathetic...

Im sorry but where on the IBM website does it show the partnership

Dont you remember how ibm announeced Stellar?

And im just trying to prevent people from getting tricked into this scam(?) project

https://www.ibm.com/case-studies/credits-ibm-cloud-blockchain-performance
Here is a link to the official IBM website.

Exactly my point. All that is, is a use case on the ibm website, meaning a client story about how great ibm cloud is.

Ie MARKETING for ibm cloud

its not a partnership. they just using ibm´s cloud infrastructure. its like saying i have a partnership with google because im using google chrome.

bla bla bla, can you read? Is it possible that any their customer just mentioned on their official website? They are going to implement IOT business models together and will present joint MVP in the near future? Or is their Vice President liar? Don't think so, all announcements are agreed by the parties of the deal, they would easily sue the project if they spread false information, relax and accept that, it's much easier to raise some doubts than have a closer look to priority points, everything that you are saying is nonsense

Dont spread speculation as facts.

The fact is that credits claims a partnership whole all they do is use ibms platform and pay for it.

Until ibm confirms ibm is nothing but a supplier of credits

Time will show who is right, looking forward MVP which will be the most important proof of this partnership, no one is interested in your opinion, I do not understand your goal, if you are not interested in the project, why are you here and demostrating assumptions as the facts