Also what do you mean? all talk and no walk. In regards to what exactly?
In regards to your response to pretty much anything that would require you to expend any effort, even if it's as simple as reading something:
Anyway I have not had time
I wish I had time to do that or had the motivation
Yet you always find time for walls of text and attacking others for not responding to you quickly enough. All talk, no walk.
I mean I have asked you to provide me any argument or reason why you think introducing such a system would not improve things. I know I rarely get an answer to questions from you... but have a think about it and if you can think of a reason why you would like to keep hunting around for negative things to report rather than spending all of your effort looking for positive things to reward whilst also leveraging merit not just to rid the boards of spammers but also to rid them of the biggest plague of "not quite spammy enough to be banned/deleted but still nowhere near the level to be considered net positive" it is the contamination of those that are driving out the good posters equally as much as the pure spammers which can be deleted eventually.
Since you haven't provided any tangible details of such a system - what exactly do you expect me to say?
Those posts already don't get merits. That doesn't stop them. In the short term and using the current tools they need to be reported and deleted. In the long term bounty campaigns need to be reigned in and/or the incentive for such posts needs to be diminished. Sorting ANN topics may solve the problem of shitty bumps. Alt discussion may need a different fix but until someone comes up with that there is no excuse for not reporting those shitposts. That is if anyone cares.