There are so many different trackers and each trecker has its own rating. And all ratings are different. It is hard to understand how they rate.
I agree with you. Each tracker has its own rating. But I think that in any case bad projects are not put on high ratings.
It may be recalled that some successful projects had an average rating at the ICO stage. Thus, those who focused on ratings missed a good investment.
In any case, it is not bad to have a rating not lower than average. This project has such a rating and that's enough.
Having a low rating does not promise a good start. Trackers are useful, even enjoy some popularity among some investors.