The project team. I ask you to change the moderator of the Russian branch of Discord. He introduced the totalitarian regime and removes all inconvenient messages from the discussion. Most likely they will block me there so that I will not ask unnecessary questions about project.
I ask only one question that interests me there: what goals does the team follow and what tasks does the team solve when developing its own unique blockchain. All these messages are deleted and he threatens to block me for such questions. I believe that in an open project there should not be hidden information on the objectives of the project, at least in all blockchain projects that respect themselves.
SaniaNET is a hater of $PACcoin, he is one of those people who can do nothing but criticize.
SaniaNET has many times offered a proposal to divide and assign between the Russian community the funds allocated to Sergey (RU) for advertising.
I read messages on Russian DISCORD more than 5 months. SaniaNET behaves like a child, he does not want to look at official sources, he requires insider information, and he constantly complains.
SaniaNET just last week found out that the official site has information about the $PAC team.
He wanted to use the $PAC community to vote for some of his coins, of which he is a representative.
From the reports on the work done, it is clear that Sergey (RU)helps development and popularizationof the $PAK, and SaniaNET only wants to harm.
Reading his messages in the Discord, I do not understand why they have not blocked him yet, he is an enemy of the $PAC. He only heitit and criticizes.
SaniaNET also repeatedly mentioned that he would sell his entire $PAC as soon as the price grew a little, after which he promised to publish here information (evidence of fraud $PAC) that would kill the $PAC Coin. According to him, he will do it as soon as he sells all of his $PAC.
SaniaNET is JUDASAny serious and advancing project has people who are either unhappy with it (and say it out loud) or are outright against it, since they e.g., support competition. That is perhaps not nice for ones point of view, but it is rather normal. I would be worried if $PAC would not have anyone against it.
If SaniaNET has any evidence of anything that is not obvious and is relevant to $PAC, he can bring it forward, why not.