@Cryptohunter
You need to analyze every profile in top 200 before you do any allegation. Just devote a day to manually  check all of them. To find the truth you do not need the data of excel sheet.

You will find that many people in top 100 are doing a lot of voluntary work. (Just try to see them and go through their post histories, you will find it.)

Unfortunately, I fit on the all the criteria that you are asking for the circle.
1. I am in top 200.
2. I have most of Merits in Meta.

But in truth,I I do not know anybody in this forum apart from their forum id. I have no friendship with  any of these in top 200 or anybody in this forum.
Even I joined crypto space just for trading (or FOMO in Dec 2017) but apart from reading in this forum , I have read various books just to understand Bitcoin and block chain and few white paper s of successful coins.

It is  not like that I am in top 200 from very start of merit inception, I just become part of it couple month back.

Instead just saying top 200 do not deserve their spot, just analyse top 200 and tell us for each profile why they don't deserve and put forward some profile ( not 200 but 10 only) that you find more deserving the top 200 in this list.
I think, if you present this case, they will definitely rewarded.
I read in some of your post that somebody is writing very good post in Altcoins section and need to be rewarded , just find these people and bring them forward.

Forget Meta, see the data, what do you say about user who got 100 plus Merits by just posting in WO threads?
Or got so much Merits in their escrow threads?
Or got merits for managing a successful bounties in past?

All these Merit will not come in Meta so will you assume that they are more better and more exceptional posters than user who are earning in Meta.

Just devote your couple of days and instead of telling us that top 200 are fully worthless, just point the users you think are useless in that club and provide few exceptional alternatives that deserves the place but not in list.