It's a trite offence and hence I disagree with the rating. That being said, there are fallacies and inconsequential statements being spit left and right by cryptohunter many of which I haven't the time to look over.
I will read over more of his posts at a later date (soon) and reconsider the rating but for now I see marlboroza's as a spur of the momenta rash move transpired from the events thereof.
Thanks please explore all of the threads in meta and that last one on reputation in chronological order in deep detail. If you get some spare time. I feel a deep review by any senior members will be essential and will help others make their minds up about this red trust for apparently objecting to being misquoted. But it has build up to that really so that is the last thread to read to put in proper context.
If you really do find any statements at all where I have not produced any evidence or any corroborating events that could not reasonably cause such a statement to be made bring them up here so we can get to the bottom of them in public.
Also please so the same for all statements that are not backed up or explained by any of the others.
I am fully hoping many will scan in depth all of those threads because everything I mention on this post is how it went down.
@ lauda I would certainly like all of the 4 threads viewed in detail about the merits one I will list them here in order in one minute...
1st ...
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5081670.0 more coming
2nd https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5084723.0
3rd
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5086297.0 more coming..
I think there is one more somewhere where r1s2g3 provided the stats when I asked him for them initially. But there was no kind of arguments on that thread really.
I was sure there was 4 main threads but I can not see the 4th one about this merit top x removal.