you are pushing for this red trust to stick.
Actually it's quite the opposite - I was trying to figure out if the misunderstanding about the quotes can be reconciled. However your incessant lying is getting in the way. It's between you and marlboroza. Good luck.
Bring the lying proof. NOW. Where are these lies?
It's literally in the post you quoted. You said I'm pushing for the red trust to stick despite my efforts to do the opposite. That's just the latest example (at the time of me reading this post; it's quite likely you did some more lying in the posts I haven't read yet).
Edit:
Suchmoon come here and explain this at once. I want to hear your entire thought process and every reply to every single thing you quoted and specifically replied to those quotes..
I know this is futile but since you asked so nicely...
In your post here you didn't specify which text you consider misquoted:
Describing disturbing fantasies of his own and pretending to quote me when I never said that at all.
So I assumed you meant the actual quotes created with the quote button, the ones in neat little boxes with author's name and date like I used just above. Not the stuff between double quotation marks. It looks like I was not the only one to interpret it that way, in fact I haven't seen anyone else yet supporting your assertion that marlboroza was attempting to attribute the text between double quotation marks to you.
That's why I replied:
You do realize that one can click on the quote and go to the post where you actually said that?
This would not make sense in any other context. Clicking on the text between double quotation marks wouldn't lead you anywhere. Clicking on the title of the boxed quote opens the original post.
Marlboroza's reference link leads to the same post so I can only assume that he also thinks you're talking about the boxed quotes.
But when you posted this:
He miss quoted me in "" also on purpose and you said you could present where I said it ... bring your evidence of accusation or delete your lie also.
I realized you are referring to the double quotation marks and suggested this:
You seem to be confused about the double quotes. If that's the case, retract your statement and let marlboroza know. The text in double quotes is not attributed to you in any plausible way that I can see.
Instead you chose to engage in a massive attack on everything and everybody that doesn't align with your conspiracy theory.