Why would i retract an ambiguous statement I would simply clarify my statement even more clearly than I though it needed for any sensible person to understand what it is I am refering to.
Because the statement is incorrect if marlboroza wasn't pretending to quote you.
Describing disturbing fantasies of his own and pretending to quote me when I never said that at all.
I would clarify my statement... it is irrelevant if I am incorrect in my assumption ...he just needs to then explain later he was not intending to quote me at all these were special super "" which means nobody said it. That is what debate and discussion is for you get on the same page the more you discuss.
You dont assume run off and give red trust.
Then even when you know full well it was his later false assumption that finally led to the red trust then he should reverse it.
The guy is asking to be removed from default trust and wants his merits reduced from the top 200 ... he is losing it.
Just tell him to remove the the red trust at once else have to answer for his actions will full explanation.
He is hiding and did not even offer an explanation to match the link he left and the description.
where is he hiding up and why are you here testing out arguments on his behalf instruct him here at once please It is disgraceful his incorrect assumptions finally led to my incorrect red trust and he just avoids and dodges me and will not even come and talk to me himself.
He is only adding to the obvious conclusion he has made a mistake and will not fix it even though he should if he is not seen to be abusing the trust system.