Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: If you were in charge of Bitcoin 2.0 what would you change?
by
franky1
on 20/12/2018, 18:36:06 UTC
flip:
because it's up to users if they want to run that code.

flop:
Consensus > Voting.  Bitcoin has never and will never be a democracy.

flop:
Screw your pathetic and antiquated notions of "voting".

flop:
Bitcoin is not a democracy.  It doesn't have elections.  There isn't a "vote"

flop:
there's no practical way to enforce it.  There is no code to prevent softforks

No amount of you calling them "inflight updates" instead of softforks will change reality to prevent them from happening in future.  There isn't code you can "strip out" to prevent "backdoor activate or F**k off".  What you want is not possible.

yes doomad, i noticed you deleted your posts to hide your dictatorship supporting rants.. and your flip flops. but you missed many

real funny thing. in your posts all you ever done was tell me what i shouldnt be doing. that i shouldnt discuss a certain topic, that i should not say x or y. and how if i wrote code how ud be the first to rekt me. and if you knew of a way early on to discourage me from being involved in bitcoin. you would use it..

and all i done was ask you to independently research a few things, without you being spoonfed info from certain people

good evening and goodnight. may you enjoy your social drama. just remember. if you dont like things i discuss there is always an ignore button. and as a reminder you cant try playing the victim of a bite when you were the one poking the bear