Should have said something about the screenshot of the TradeOgre chat used as proof of Trade Ogre's intention. Btw, was the "ok" response, OK I received the message. OK I will do all that you asked. OK, thanks for communicating.
@Masternode777 said last week, it was already arranged that TradeOgre would take all wallets for Quantis down on December 31 to synch with the new chain. This in fact was false at the time Masternode777 said it and still false.
It is very possible that TradeOgre will do as Masternode777 said now with regard to the Jan 4 date, it is possible they won't.
Common practice for a new fork (not really a fork in this case, it is a new chain with effort to cause abandonment of original chain) is for the new fork to get listed separately from main chain. Afterall, part of Masternodes777 strategy is to replace the current Quantis with a new Quantis. This would royally screw current QUAN coin holders who do not swap. It would screw the miners and mining pools.
In prior chats on Telegram, Masternode777 dismissed Tradeogre as a small insignificant exchange. This is just rhetoric of a scammer. He uses lots of rhetoric that I am sure is appealing to many.
It is very possible that the new chain will be a success, but it also very likely some QUAN holders will screwed, intentionally. What if you went trekking to nowhere and came back and found out that a "team" had decided 10 days was enough notice and it was your fault for not logging into discord every day to check for changes. I am sure there will be variations of the specific times and rhetoric to emotionally persuade readers to fixate on different aspects of fact, by Masternode777.
The philosophical bottom line is who owns the coin--- a few or the community? Why does a "fork" have the right to cause intentional failure of the main chain to ensure its success.
The practical bottom line is will Trade Ogre delist the current chain or not, and I would wait for an official notice from Trade Ogre-- I put the odds at 50 - 50.
Good luck to all.