Re: Preventing Signature Spammers and Increasing Quality of Discussion
Coolcryptovator received a negative feedback because of his baseless accusation;
He seems certain that my current account is bought and I have also bought other btctalk accounts. He shows my 3 year old thread as reference to his accusation. Unless, he proves that I, indeed bought account(s) or my current is bought, my negative feedback will stay indefinitely.
He seems certain that my current account is bought and I have also bought other btctalk accounts. He shows my 3 year old thread as reference to his accusation. Unless, he proves that I, indeed bought account(s) or my current is bought, my negative feedback will stay indefinitely.
I don't care about your negative feedback. You had tried to buy account. Here is proof : http://archive.is/LxeFO , So it's dubious to me also you bought. Buy the way there is many scam accusation feedback on your untrusted feedback, what about that. They all are fake ? Why they left scam accusation comment ?
1. Dubious. OK Mr. Sherlock. Rather than creating a counter-argument against my signature spamming solution offer, you choose to engage in personal attacks, fine.
2. Can't you see that the untrusted red feedback came right after I exposed an alt-account ring? I mean, it's not too hard to scroll down you know. You coming here and talking about those meaningless red feedbacks, like you trying to show me bad. Dude, step up in your game a bit.
As I said, create a counter-argument. I'm here to talk about alternatives to the problem, you here to dig my 3 year old threads.