Do you I have to tell you again that you are of no note and no importance? I don't need to even answer you nor give you any heed at all?
Would be almost true if it wasn't followed by a wall of text.
Merit system and trust system are broken - i will destroy the credibility of both of those because they are currently tools for centralised power and manipulation.
Well, you're destroying
someone's credibility for sure, what with your cringy bragging and the puppet show.
Post all of your stupid questions on a meta thread from now, on i see your ploy to waste my time on this one thread... when I prefer to highlight what a jealous and petty non achiever with a damaged mind you are to your ex fans in meta.
Nah, this thread is fine for that purpose. I have no interest in assisting your shitposting in Meta. Anyone who cares can find your drama here.
That shows how concerned I am about your feeble mind. Hurry up I know you can't resist still trying you poor wretch. I will expect all of these in meta threads asap. Now hurry up I don't have all day to spend with you idiots.
come bring your analogy to meta in that thread so I can destroy you all over again whilst highlighting the goons refusing to remove it all over again....
I will just keep offering the challenge I mean the fact they will not do it immediately is brilliant I will never get bored of demonstrating they are not enthusiasts they are paid2post fools that have achieved nothing of note.
This point actually leads nicely into my other larger point that I can keep bitch slapping you and the goons with over and over.
Now I am going back to meta and if you are boycotting me that will play to my plan anyway it proves collusion and fear.
Yes, you're winning bigly.
LOL what a fucking moron... you still think your puppet is gonna help your cause.
all start with cryptohunter not agree when one of central gang say "pre merit legends are spammers"
CH point out the fact & data of the still broken aspect & centralize merit system correctly
marlboroza have most centralized merit history & get angry when data show
marlboroza then try stop CH with fake
RED TRUST but had to remove 4 fake
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5086816.0gang cant handle criticism centralize merit
one of gang make sock first to ban CH on plagarisms
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1926895.msg48790244#msg48790244& fail - source was there
next marlboroza main account start digging for plagarisms again to shut down CH with 4yoa post
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1926895.msg48828854#msg48828854& fail again
keep digging
marlboroza dig posts still today try to ban CH
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5086297.msg48837494#msg48837494still fail
this dirty tactic of marlboroza shut down opinion by search ancient post 4 plagarisms
we not worry about ""plagarisms"" in 2013-2014 like now
TP & SM hide from subject in threads
I say
dirty tactic used
you think good to use tactic ?
how u feel if marlboroza search all your old post 2 ban u on technical if u disagree with marlboroza ?marlboroza try find me 2 to dig 4 plagarisms but wont expose
apology - have to hide writing type or be attack by dirty tactic
Gone full "Animal Farm" with this one:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5088852I am in favour of removing sigs for everyone except mods and a handful of people that have strict criteria handed down to them to keep order but it is applied to everyone fairly and equally.
Apparently the fix to "centralized power" (or whatever the gripe is) would be to make some users more equal than others.
I was hoping for some new entertainment this morning and CH didn't disappoint.
Merit butthurt:
Good post and I am glad you made the effort to make it. However I am unable to merit it at this point. I will though in future if it is proven to make my post redundant and demonstrate it is of zero merit value. However I expect all merits removed from your post if it turns out to be a bunch of words that does not rebut my post nor even tackle the prime points I make.
[...]
Or will I here now provide reasonable and corroborating evidence that this is a post that gains a bunch of merit for something that tries to refute something that is clearly provable and observable???
and therefore not only should it not get any merit it should actually get negative merit for trying to convince people of something that is clearly NOT true.
[...]
Each person should remove your merits for that post if you can not prove what you have said is correct relating to my post. In adding merit to a post that is negative and not adding merit to a post that is correct and pushes towards improving systems he demonstrates are not only open to corruption but are being used by a gang to stifle free speech......that is a system that needs to be fixed or removed. With that in mind all merit scores would be null and void and any meaning read into them should be struck away. To even consider more systems built upon a broken system like that is not going to go well.
Much open-minded:
Let me accept as I am open minded then you COULD be correct about some things. Let me then find the optimal and true answer by having a sensible debate. If you are correct then I will retract my post and put a big RED statement that I am wrong at the top.
[...]
YOU CAN NOT POSSIBLY ARGUE AGAINST THIS OR CALL IT A CONSPIRACY.
Math fail:
some of the 99.93% of current posters (not top200 merit hoarders) are able to make posts as good if not better than some of the 0.13% of the board (top 200 merit hoarders)
Sockpuppeting:
I can tell you now that chosen username (who ever you are) you are worth infinite everyone who dares not speak out about the gang taking over this board and of infinite value above those that will oppose observable instances and events to suite their own personal selfish agendas. You will not be forgotten here forgotten here.
[...]
merry xmas and a happy new year indeed to chosen username and those that have done the right thing since I have been here.