My post on the
first page has been updated.
According to statistics, the total number of sMerits earned by all members increases by about 400 each week.
Not quite on topic, but I feel bad. I've not been very active over the last few days, and my source merits have been stacking up. I'll need to have a merit awarding blitz tomorrow, and get them down to an approved level.
We really could do with the ability to delegate merits - especially to some of the local boards.
In my opinion, there is no need to delegate merits.
theymos has already delegated sMerits to you for distributing them among the members, because you are a trustful merit source and contribute to the forum well.
I wish you good health.
We are practically are on the same page in terms of aggregate minimum current stored sMerit: I make it a few more, 38.446 in the hands of 7.785 forum members, which is very near your figures. We do seem to differ though in terms of distribution by rank:
~snip~
Its strange, since I updated my rank information yesterday (rank derived from user profile, and only Copper Member has been stripped to equivalent real rank). I make it that there are 1.009 Newbies with 2.873 sMerits, which Id say are merged in your Jr. Member rank level.
Yes, these ranks are based on the amount of merits regardless of current activity.
I was actually surprised to see the difference between our overall statistics. It seems that my total number of users who have sMerits is greater by one than your total number. Therefore I compared my file containing all merit transfer transactions to the "merit.all.txt" file made by
LoyceV.
I noticed that the following transaction is missing in the "merit.all.txt" file:
1531821834 50 2674194.msg36115570 554 516296
As far as I can see, the red tagged user #516296 named as
Storx started with 100 merits, received 133 merits and now has 233 merits. I guess that this transaction has not been deleted and should be restored in the "merit.all.txt" file. In this case our overall statistics will be equal.