, i am saying we need a set of rules, so when someone is not satisfied with the tag he gets, he can then complain or appeal based on an existing rule. it will be much easier to judge the case if we have such rules.
* this only applies to DT members as their feedback appears on the profile.
We currently have something similar to this but not working at all,since we have DT1 and DT2 level members,if the DT2 members are abusing the system means they can eliminate the person who abused the system from DT1 trust list.But the problem is not enough active DT1 members to analyse about the people in their trust list.* this only applies to DT members as their feedback appears on the profile.
this mainly because the DT1 members have no rules to based their judgment on, they will have to do a lot of reading and waste a lot of time to verify if it should be treated as abuse or not.
but if we have a list of rules, the complaint will be easy to read.
DT member XYZ broke rule 15 by giving me a negative trust after i posted a picture of my naked ass.
rules no 15 : you can not tag a person just for showing their ass on the forum.
DT memeber get's warned or unlisted or whatever the rules state.
but if we have to count on each person's own logic. do you think posting an image of someone's ass is offensive and requires a tag ? well AFAIK they could get a positive feedback
for that and it will still be valid as long as the rules don't say the opposite.now of course that is just an example, rules don't have to carry that much of details
.