That twinkle you see, that little jitter the star does is bigger than the parallax measurements "modern" science uses to calculate the stars distances at billions and trillions of miles. The "modern" scientist can't not know their measurements are significantly below the margin of error caused by atmospheric refraction. The intellectual dishonesty here is self-evident.

We've got users here like BADecker who defend the globe by promoting the idea that an astronomical sextant, a tool used for measuring angles on plane can make these subtle parallax measurements in the face of massive star twinkle. He'll do shit like taking multiple measurements then using the average, as if it makes up for being below the margin of error. The truth is the distance to the star can be calculated with plane trigonometry using the angles measured with the sextant against a planar horizon; the distance works out to be about 3,000 miles. Again the intellectual dishonesty here with globe superheroes like BADecker is self-evident.

The very idea of viewing stars billions and trillions of miles away is absurd, the apparent visual size of these objects would be so small no honest scientist would claim we could see them. There's nothing but corrupt assholes who engage in gaslighting and concern trolling when their claims are scrutinized.

There's nothing wrong with having criminals executed.




consider suicide you clown