create some content of your own.....
LOL so now you just start creating different situations to yours to defend... because you do not have the intelligence to realise that is not applicable to your case at all.
Let's just take this
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1009045.msg47044986#msg47044986Where you do acknowledge the original source ? are you claiming you created that text and then made it into a pic? about the spinning balls? are you saying embedding original content from merely a 3rd part hosting site they may have placed their own original content is okay? I mean how would one even validate from some hosting site where it was from or whom created it?
Where do most memes acknowledge the original source of that content? some link to a 3rd party webhosting is a reference to original source?
That spinning ball text if copied and pasted from a website here it would be plagiarism... .not that I would give 1 fuck so long as it was not done all of the time and that person was being helpful and was not just doing to to earn money. So now a newbie bot should not rip content via copy and paste of text they can just rip the text and place it into a pic on 3rd party host and that will be okay? I mean even if you are saying people need to know to click image source then go to that url .... how to know if this is put there by the original source or someone else just ripped off his stuff and put it there? even if he put it there himself and there is no way to track back to him for credit then again that makes it impossible to for any plagiarist to get caught. That kinds of makes it impossible to complain about any pics placed here and linked to 3rd party sites. The entire thing is almost a way to rip non original content spam the board with it and then make it impossible to complain about because you claim that embedded link to the 3rd party source is a good enough.
.
What is to stop bots grabbing text splatting it into jpegs or any other pics and splattering the board with it on any related terms?? nothing that's right and that is what we want to prevent.
Stop trying to have the last incorrect word or create some kind of situation to defend that is not applicable to the situation you are in.
I am not interested in you filling your post count up (collating without direct reference to original source) with pics of others original work so stop worrying yourself about it i can smell your fear from here. Just shut up and buzz off and find some more original work of others to post from 3rd party hosting sites
I will continue to bring new ideas to the board and help provide a fairer system until the entire arena is decentralised and trustless
[quote author=xtraelv link=topic=1009045.msg47044986#msg47044986 date=1539941989]
[img]https://i.imgur.com/wXXS2z6.jpg[/img]
[b][size=12pt]I'm sure you can spot 8 inches per mile squared with your naked eyes from at least a mile away.[/size][/b]
[img]https://i.imgur.com/FlAhCHZ.png[/img]
[img]https://i.imgur.com/RI27m2p.png[/img]
[img]https://i.imgur.com/HIXDhaB.jpg[/img]
[b][size=12pt]I haven't met a flat Earther yet that has been to the Antarctic to prove this is not true.[/size][/b]
[/quote
If you look at the links in the code you will see that the content is not hosted on bitcointalk.
The legalities of that I already explained in a previous post. Linking to an external site is not considered a breach of copyright. The subtle difference is that I did not post a copy of the image on this site. I posted a link to the image which is available on another site. Which is akin to posting a url directing to another site.
Any copyright issues (if they exist) are with the site that hosts the images and the person who posted it there.
The majority of plagiarism that is detected on bitcointalk is bots and people copy pasting without any input to the content.
Linking urls and image source links with commentary that contributes to the conversation is in line with the purpose of a forum.
Copy and pasting to increase post count does not contribute in most instances.
If you copy and paste text a simple acknowledgement of source eliminates plagiarism accusations. It is a good habit to reference sources.
The bottom line is that plagiarism as defined as "copy and pasting text without acknowledgement" is not allowed under the bitcointalk rules.
I am not after your for copyright, I dont care what you do so long as you are not spamming the forum constantly to earn money.
However tracing back that image of the spinning ball (even if i know to pull image source some may not) gives me no greater chance of attributing it to the original source creator than if it was just posted here on bitcointalk servers
So it is no better than copy and pasting the spinning ball text straight here in terms of reference to the original source and not claiming as your own
A newbie who wanted to spam with this method could find spinning ball texts or whatever slap them in a pic and embed then via 3rd party host into threads here where they are mildly relevant .... a bot could do this and there would be according to you no way to act against them
To me it is actually away to get away with using non original text or material without attributing or referencing the actual source ... it is get out of jail free benefit from others work. I can tell you know I bet someone doing that a lot for financial gain would be in trouble. I would not be surprised if this is the next noob way of spamming of non original work and will be hard for spiders to jump on too.