Definitely nobody will continue this project after it burns out all the money worth of 12 million dollars. All the ICO and all coins will go to dust.
You can only speak about you and not about everyone. I am here for the project and from what I can see in the Discord, there are quiet some others that do the same. Cryptocurrency projects can work without any funding - in fact Bitcoin development worked without funding for years.
Get real! Don't dream what you want to dream. The community did not do a god damn thing about the code. The protocol was development using 3 million dollars in funds by them. They did so well that Robin (main guy and developer as well) has left the project. They published in their report that they spend over 250,000 USD every month investing in coding, marketing and communities. The money they invest is the reason why there is some noise in the community. Otherwise nobody gives a cent about this project. Look at the github

Except the team who was well paid with millions and millions of dollars (last year they spent 2-3 million dollars to write code), nobody else contributed in a significant way.
I think we need to get the facts right again.
1- Nimiq-core
The public repo for the Javascript Node:
https://github.com/nimiq-network/core/graphs/contributors32 contributors, 10 from the team and the rest from the community.
Seven open PR at the time of writing. Three of them from community members.
About Robin being the "main guy and developer", at least 3 community members have contributed as much as him. Not saying his contributions are not important, but your statement is not quite valid.
2- Nimiq core-rs
Rust implementation of the Nimiq Node. Released this month and already has one open PR from a community member.
3- Nimiq Apps
https://nimiq.com/en/#appsNine Apps made by the Nimiq Team, 16 built by community developers.
I think your overall assessment of the community and the development of Nimiq shows a general lack of knowledge of open source project and software development.
If you have questions we are happy to answer them but so far you have been sharing nothing but factually wrong arguments.