snip
Don't deviate.
What your previous postings seem to say is that joining the EU was the single decision of the president, which it clearly wasn't.
It has gone through all legal instances of the country and even through referendum, which was not required by law.
The quote you just posted adds nothing to your argumentation.
Also if 50% + 1 vote it not enough, where do you put the limit? 60 % ? 80% ? 100% ?
People tend do disagree. Doing so you kill evolution & progress.
Sure that part of the EU agreement technically had a referendum, but if it does not accurately represent an actual majority of the people who does it serve? The other problem is now the EU just dictates to its members, not its members dictating how thew organization runs. It has become an unaccountable and disconnected bureaucracy, as if the unaccountable national governments aren't bad enough on their own.
My point is a 1% margin in science is well within a usual standard deviation for error (intentional or otherwise), which means it might or might not actually be an accurate mandate. That's why I make the distinction. Anyways it doesn't matter. The EU is simply walking around like a zombie at this point waiting for some one to put it out of its misery in its current bureaucratic form.