Re: The more there is limit on bounties the fewer the dumper

Bounty restrictions can fix few problems facing project price drop after listed on exchange,

1) if any dev want to avoid dumpers then they must limit bounty participants, the limit the participants they better ,if a bounty only request 300 participants at highest and the 300 became a dumper it won't hurt ,unlike 2000+ participants

2) devs should forget bounty when still on ICO ,allow bounties after your project finished ICO successfully and make your project is doing great before allowing bounty
This are just ideas ,if you have anything better please drop on here and let's share.

For number one, it doesn't make sense. It's still the same. Whether 300 or 1000, same thing will happen. Example, the budget is 1,500,000 tokens. 300 participants will get 5000 tokens each (not considering the rank or number of followers). 1000 participants will get 1500 tokens each but still would sum up to 1,500,000 token potential for dumping. It is still best to pay bounty hunters in fiat or eth.

well, i'm happy if the bounty hunter participant gets paid with fiat or eth.

but it will not be fair to some people, especially to investors, they will feel it will not be good. i also don't really agree with this, because the price of tokens that we will get will probably be greater than eth or fiat that is given to us.

I think it is just your opinion that investors won't be comfortable that bounty participants will be paid with ETH or fiat. I don't think it is the case. I understand that our reward could be greater if we are to be paid with the token we are promoting but looking at the trend, it is also not the case. But if you may, you can use the ETH paid to you to buy for the token you are promoting and hold. That way, we can be more confident that the price of the token can't be dumped so hard.