That's a lie right there. Didn't take you long. No one is trying to limit scaling. Your interpretation of the word "scaling" is just different to what other users running full nodes understand it to be. No amount of telling people to "research" (because we all know that's coming next) will make people think that "scaling" means what you think it means.
you have no clue
scaling ONCHAIN can happen in many ways.
... its you thats stuck in the echochamber that if people are not fluffy clouding LN then they must be big blockers
... i have mentions many different ways.
... pushing people off to another network is not scaling the network. its de-populating the network
get out of your echo chamber. the rhetoric of LN or bigblocks is not the only option. but your stuck in that mindset as your only argument/rebuttal. and yes do some research
When there's consensus for a larger blockweight, it will happen. Until then, try to recognise that lone users with fringe ideals are wholly impotent in a system that uses consensus. And you are way out there on the fringes, buddy.
like the 35% for segwit1x...... which would have just died.. but didnt because of the august 1st controversy
(again dont try denying it didnt happen even your kings admit it did, they even admit they instigated it)
i even said. if your kings went with segwit2x(segwit2mb variant) back in 2016 there would have been no controversy
i even said. if your kings went with segwit2x(NYA agreement) in 2017 there would have been no controversy
but nah. 35% was not good enough so (ADMITTED BY THE DEVS) august 1st did push it through and without people needing to upgrade as it was a 'mandatory inflight upgrade(your kings words) bilateral fork(your kings words) or as you prefer "compatible"
all meaning non consensus needed as no opt-in was required(no upgrade needed)