How have they been harmed if they lost no money? That makes zero sense.
You are quite literally not paying people their winnings, and still haven't offered a reasonable explanation for why you've voided the contest and bets.
When you saw I was using it you even said "Imao it's the exact source of BaB 1." and I said "is that a problem?"
You then said "You could use it and hope Daniel doesn't notice lol"
Yet I'm in the wrong here yeah?
Yes.
Obviously. You were the one that pirated the software, not me. Even though this is out taken out of context (where I go on to tell you it's best to buy a license, or comply with the terms). And this directly contradicts statements you repeatedly made Daniel and the CGF and then even publicly:
You know we were under the opinion, wrongly, that we were able to use that code after discussing it with RHavar.
Blaming me for your piracy for no reason, based on conversations we had in-confidence after the fact. I very clearly never endorsed piracy (just pointed out you could get away with it if Daniel doesn't notice) and several times encouraged you to follow the license. You obviously thought very little of our "friendship" if you were willing to try stab me in the back so easily?You've told me about many actual pirated BaB sites and said you don't even bother going after them even when they were making millions of $ yet you jumped straight on BetKing when we had zero players playing in the game?
I don't care. I no longer own BaB. It's not my place to care. Almost everyone without fail who pirates copies of BaB ends up failing. Why? Because a gambling business is built upon trust, so by starting with known pirated software it almost guarantees you will never be trusted. You'll notice yours is falling apart because no one trusts you any more (and can you blame them? The last months you've done nothing but lie and walk back promises).
The only reason I cared about you pirating BaB was because you were going around blaming me (why?!!) and repeatedly saying other falsehoods (e.g. you didn't know) along with a lot of other unethical behavior (e.g. running the pirated version for a week or so to see how well it did before "deciding" to comply with the license, even though Daniel repeatedly told you he was not ok with that that). And then you obfuscated the source (changing stuff like the canvas to an svg) and tried to pretend it was a reimplementation.
I'm sorry, but all that's on you. And all that's behavior by someone hilariously untrustworthy.