Please play the old Lutpin's campaign by his and lightlord's rules, it is the only fair way. I saw your spreadsheet with additional rounds, but it is NOT how Lutpin had it, you created your own (cheaper for you organizers) way of handling this.
I wouldn't blame Hhampuz for all of this crap, which is what he inherited from lightlord and Lutpin. Any old beefs with the old campaign that was run by lightlord and managed by Lutpin should be brought to the attention of lightlord and him only. I don't know what conversations went on between Hhampuz and lightlord before the two new campaigns started, but ultimately lightlord is the final decision maker.
I've changed my neg to neutral on lightlord just out of respect for his past actions, but I'm still wary of what he might do going forward. That's why I suggested that Hhampuz not risk his reputation by going along with anything questionable from lightlord if such a thing should occur. Hopefully that won't be the case, and anyway Lutpin played a big role himself in screwing over the previous participants. Hell, I was a member of the 777Coin campaign myself for a while until I finally got sick of late payments and so forth. I don't know what happened with Lutpin, because even though payments were sometimes late, he was always fair and participants ultimately did get paid during my time in the campaign.
I think everyone should consider the Bitvest and 777Coin campaigns as a fresh start. Both are in good hands with Hhampuz IMO. I have no vested interest in this, by the way. Somehow I got sucked into the drama when I was asked to tag lightlord and Lutpin, which I did not want to do until it became very apparent to me that a lot of people were getting screwed over. That's why I keep giving my opinion on things with these campaigns. I will keep an eye on how things are going, but I'm going to bow out of the drama for now.
Good luck to everyone.