Please understand a simple distinction.

I moderated groundless opinions and excuses

They moderated an observable  fact describing  way the systems operate and the implications of that system.

Is that clearer for you now?

If not visit my thread here

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5088852.0

and feel free to discuss further.

Also I have never started with these faux rebuttals and then vanished .... I finish the debates.
This is directly related to the first thread he needs to demonstrate that he understands first that his faux rebuttal holds no weight and that the systems function as they function.


I await explanation of my WARPED AGENDA

I will be waiting a long time i suspect. This is how they operate. They spout on nonsense then slink off when challenged.

Mikey can first come back and finish one debate in meta before starting more

But sure if he wants to post the top 10 fans and receivers for all the people that  appeared in every one of my meta merit cycling threads we can take a look together. He can work out who they are just pull up all the merit cyling meta threads and pull out the same old gang appearing in all of them.

I would rather spend my time on this same issue on the meta thread he found it possible to take time to read my first long post but then found it too difficult to read the subsequent posts that prove his post is nothing other than a faux rebuttal of my central point. Meta is where the point needs to be ground home. Not marooned out in rep