Marketing = 3 million
infrastructure = 1 million or cost to deploy hubs needed for 1000TPS
tech = ~6 million - infrastructure
What the hell is "infrastructure fund"? Why money is being juggled so easily?
That 1 million will appreciate significantly if we do things right, so why such arbitrary decisions are taken so lightly?

That should be a part of tech and tech will decide how much is needed to support the network, not some arbitrary round number.
And I want a fiscal conservative, like rickyjames to have at least a veto power, so we won't burn through all this money in a month! This radio deal we've got into so quickly doesn't look particularly bright.
Also, giving the rich more money in addition to their original stakes doesn't seem right. At least for outsiders it won't look good, we already have the distribution accusations...
I would rather see an independent trustees, who are
not the original stakeholders.
We need decentralization, not concentration of power in the hands of a few.