Of course I can't.
There is nothing that can be answered to you, you can't be proven wrong.
Using ridiculous comparison is a tool to try to make you think a little bit but it doesn't seem it has worked.
You are asking for empirical data linking temperature rise, CO2 levels and human activity.
This doesn't exist, cannot exist, will never exist. That's all.
But if like TECSHARE you believe that's how science work, then you just need to go back to school. This is not how science work, this has never been and will never be.
No, I will admit when I am wrong, but you aren't smart enough to be the guy to put me in that position in the overwhelming majority of cases. At least you can admit your global warming cult has no empirical data backing it, and therefore has no science backing it.