The slate of treasurers is: klee, bybitcoin, neer.g with pouncer as alternate. One treasurer for each of the three committees.
Lets table any discussions about specific funding decisions that were made in the past or proposed, we MUST come to consensus on Process. Without this consent, there are no funds to debate about.
I suggest that the selection process for the three different committees starts right away, those are the decision makers. Merit based for each committee. Details on size, etc. to work out but that is up to each committee.
One step at a time. Current step is to get consensus on the Process
James
Lets table any discussions about specific funding decisions that were made in the past or proposed, we MUST come to consensus on Process. Without this consent, there are no funds to debate about.
I suggest that the selection process for the three different committees starts right away, those are the decision makers. Merit based for each committee. Details on size, etc. to work out but that is up to each committee.
One step at a time. Current step is to get consensus on the Process
James
ladies and gentlemen, you can see right here and right now how the revolution to take the common heritage of the NXT community from the hands of the many into the hands of the few is complete.
Wasn't it more like "The committee discusses ideas and solutions with the community and make some polls for getting the overall opinion before making decisions"? I don't want voting's to make the final decisions, but there should be polls to get the opinion of the many, like it was stated in the old voting thread. Then, we can
edit:
Quote
A funding committee follow "open bounty" concept
hm.