You meant TWO POSTS (if you count report example)
Kinda sorta... that post had already been merited by the time you posted the link here so technically it doesn't meet the rules.
Just a question regarding reporting a post here-
The objective of this thread is to send enough sMerits to post which deserves. I just don't get one point, it's not a complain. marlboroza has reported one post but he didn't send any sMerit in that post. He hadn't enough sMerits to send or anything else? If I am reporting a post here means, I believe that post deserves to get merit, therefore, I should send sMerit first. Isn't the way it should work?
I'm assuming he ran out. Also the OP requires posts without merits.
Also I'll love to appeal to merit source since I can get their attention here. Please when meriting our posts please increase the allocation. I'm not complaining of not receiving merit (I do receive so thanks) but please try increasing the amount you send. I get an average of 1 smerit from normal user I just feel it isn't fair receiving the same amount from you guys with exception to few. Thanks. I hope you understand where I'm coming from.
That doesn't really change much in the long run. You're either going to get fewer posts merited at higher rates or more posts at lower rates. However it is important that sources attempt to exhaust their allocations even if that means lowering their standards a little bit and/or increasing spending per post.