Sweet, there goes my account.
All it takes is some unhinged ramblings from Timelord2067.
I can see the intent behind this, but I'm definitely feeling screwed over by bullshit feedback.
All it takes is some unhinged ramblings from Timelord2067.
I can see the intent behind this, but I'm definitely feeling screwed over by bullshit feedback.
I hope that current DT members look into these feedbacks and fix them, either by countering them or by asking the DT member who gave the negative trust to remove it "if it's a false accusation with no solid proof"or by untrusting / tagging him as a last resort.
i don't see that happening too fast and easy, but the current system kind of allow current DT members to tweak the list , i hope it gets used for a good purpose to defend the innocent and punish the guilty.
People on Default Trust are under no obligations. So I'm not getting my hopes up. They might feel the need to clean up their own feedbacks left for others (like TMAN was saying above), but exclusion or countering negative feedback is a whole other issue. There's a lot of social pressures there. I think that usually only happens among prominent members or in really egregious and visible cases. Most people will probably just be ignored.
That's why I'm just hoping someone excludes Timelord2067 on the basis that he's tagged lots of other people without actual evidence too. I guess it's just a regular thing he does. (I'm sure there's legit tags too, but it's an obvious problem) So this is sort of a litmus test for me regarding whether this system can be just or not.