As stated, the aTriz scam was exposed after that. How could I have used it as a reference beforehand? Had he not already been identified as someone with horrible judgement, the aTriz support while he was scamming would have done it. Dont get mad at me that hes continued to add to his list of shady behavior even after I excluded him...
I'm not mad at you, I'm just not trusting you for your ever-shifting excuses. If this was a single occurrence I'd call it a difference of opinions and leave it at that. But you seem to have misused DT ratings and exclusions more than once. For example you
neg-trusted a user for posting in your thread, accused of buying the account, and refused to remove the rating even after the user proved otherwise. How many times did you edit that rating to change the narrative?
LOL. That user was threatening me for quite some time. I didnt make most of it public. Theres no way Id ever remove that rating. Hes lucky I didnt call the police. He 100% deserved the rating he received and probably a lot more. Ive gotten so many death threats from users here over the years, I dont even try to make them public as it would add to my workload. This is actually a good example of why TMAN shouldnt be in DT. He left that lunatic positive trust after he saw me being attacked by him. This is not what we want to see here at bitcointalk. So apparently attacking me is reason enough to earn default trust from TMAN now... Definitely some adjustments need to be made.
2017-11-14 I trust this bloke.. he speaks out against the tyrannic OG"SADAM"Nasty.. so he is good in my book