i was only asking you a simple question, and now you went about what you think i want , it's pretty much the same shit i had with cryptohunter before, i am not sure how you view the "apparent" from my side , the apparent to me now is that you are accusing someone for something without a solid proof. you asking us to exclude that member from our trust list, i am more than willing to do so if you provide your evidence.

i have no reason to try to prove Lauda is legit simply because i do not give a fuck, it's you who need to prove the opposite, so why not use his/her escrow service and document the scam process and present it before everyone to win this war once and forever?

the more evidence-less accusations on Lauda the more people want to trust him/her, ever heard of  "whatever doesn't kill you simply makes you stronger"? so pull the trigger on 1 solid proof "assuming you have any" and end Lauda's career on the internet instead of giving her more power and reputation.