I don't agree with all the negative feedback left by DTs but I certainly would strongly advise against ~[insert name of default trust member] because feedback is meant as a warning to other users.
By eliminating all feedback left by a DT because just some of it is controversial leaves users unaware of potential identified risks.
Ultimately using a ~[insert name of default trust member] just means that you won't be ware of the potential risks.
I recommend adding as many users that you trust to your trust list (and leave them positive feedback) and only exclude people if your really don't trust them (not if they just have a few differences of opinion). That is how the system was designed to work.
By eliminating all feedback left by a DT because just some of it is controversial leaves users unaware of potential identified risks.
Ultimately using a ~[insert name of default trust member] just means that you won't be ware of the potential risks.
I recommend adding as many users that you trust to your trust list (and leave them positive feedback) and only exclude people if your really don't trust them (not if they just have a few differences of opinion). That is how the system was designed to work.
By everyone excluding the bad apples with a ~, it makes certain they Lose DT Status and their reign of abuse ends.
Sadly it is the best that can be done, preferable wold be to scrap the whole useless DT system.
All adding members does is create default trust gangs, that will still abuse the system for their personal gain.
DT is a corrupt system, no matter how it is managed. And it will always harm more than it ever helped.
