I have provided evidence for every point I have made.
These people are not against me - why would they be. They are against criteria being brought to Red trust and merit allocation that will remove all of their power. I am calling for such criteria to be introduced to make things fairer for all and prevent free speech being influenced.
That is it .... that is all there is to understand.
I would refer to those as claims, not evidence actually.
I haven't been on this forum for far too long, but I'm quite familiar with how things work here when there's 'valid" evidence to support certain claims, I've seen several reputable member get tagged when they do wrong regardless of their reputation.
If you're got any proofs of Suchmoon sending merits to his alts or Selling them, post them here let's see if he'd get tagged or be left off the hook simply because he's considered to be part of a gang or Show a proof of Lauda plagiarizing then we'll get to know If indeed she controls Theymos and Other Mods(just as his/her trust ratings currently states).
Produce my claims that have no evidence or strong corroborating observable events to support.
I'm not asking for him to be banned or strongly punished. They are simply using the subjective nature of the systems of control to their own ends and attempting to influence free speech. I would simply like criteria introduced that we all need to abide by that will remove that subjectivity from where abuse can reside. Of course though they should be blacklisted from trust positions.