Well the details are dynamic, they are changing as we speak.
This is the beauty of it all, it isn't a state that someone came up with a theoretical idea and went all in (as cool as it might be), every idea is tested, every option is valued - and in the end the best is taken.
So many technical aspects of the client have changed and might still change, the investment you make it the same as you make in any other coin - based on if you believe this can and will be a big thing.
No one makes you buy into this coin, this is 100% optional and there will be an option to get coins via hatching (similar to mining).
I think if you truly compare eMunie to any other coin (besides bitcoin), you will see that even prior launch, the efforts gone into development are huge - whilst other coins with over $50M in market cap don't have anything that differentiates them from the rest (besides block time / reward size).
Has the exchange been tested? You know, the bit that sends signals to the buffer to create more emu and keep everything stable. The reason for emunie to exist at all. Has it been written even?
Has the "bug" where Dan's hatchers get 10x more earnings than everyone else's been fixed yet? After all, that is 50% of all gains we're talking about.
I'm sure you wouldn't want people handing over their money otherwise.