This may be obvious to you, kuroman, but how many people on this forum do you think are at least marginal C programmers?
Let's all use words, examples, and conversations that are available to the entire community. Limiting the conversation to a few, either through expediency or hubris, doesn't help the greater good.
No solutions are off the table right now - not all possible solutions are ON the table yet. LOL We're not yet at the stage where we need to fight over options. Thankfully, we now have time to propose and more importantly TEST the solutions on the testnet, not just on an Excel spreadsheet or in a Matlab pageprint.
Everyone - put your 'thinking caps' on and get those ideas on the table!
Thank you!
I don't understand your point here? I posted the KGW code to people that are concerned about it and were claiming it is overly complicated which is not the case as proven is explaned several times.
Kuroman - I'm sorry you don't understand my point here. Please permit me to restate it in a way that might be easier to understand. First - the programming language with which I'm most familiar is Fortran. How comfortable would you feel debating the guts of the KGW in Fortran 77?
Now expand that to the entire community: How many people here - miners, speculators, retailers, charities - do you think know ANY programming language?
Simply put: You did post code. It might make sense to the 7 or 8 people here that are fans of Kernighan and Ritchie (the authors/creators of the C programming language) - but that means you're not communicating meaningfully to >97% of the community. I'm fairly sure that's not the result you're hoping for. I'm trying to help you get your excellent analysis into the hands of a greater portion of the community. I hope you will do just that.